Voters prefer the expulsion of those in the United States illegally, the survey finds the survey, but say that Trump went too far

Nine months after the start of President Trump’s mass expulsion campaign, registered voters largely support the idea of ​​illegally withdrawing immigrants who have arrived in the country, even if the majorities say they believe that his methods went too far, according to the latest investigation by the New York Times and the University of Siena.

Since Trump has returned to power, his administration has promulgated a new ban on travel, sought to draw temporary humanitarian protections from hundreds of thousands of people, advanced immigrants in countries from which they are not federal law agents in Chicago, Washington, DC and other important cities in a power show to fight against crime and illegal.

At that time, the share of registered voters who preferred to deport immigrants illegally living in the country – 54% – remained unchanged.

More than 90% of Republicans, 52% of the self -employed and almost 20% of Democrats continue to largely support the idea of ​​deporting those here illegally.

More specifically, 51% said they thought the government mainly expressed people who “should be expelled”, while 42% said the government deported bad people.

“I think there were many people who were brought to the country who should not have been brought to the country,” said Laura Lechner, 67, responsible for republican radio traffic in Wichita, Kan.

“Remove them is the right thing to do,” she said.

Shaban Binnatli, 33, a home delivery driver in Virginia who voted for Trump, said that US immigration laws would prevent the Trump administration from deporting people who were legally in the country and should not be deleted. He also said he trusted Mr. Trump to do things right.

“Even President Trump cannot expel a legal person,” said Binnatli, who immigrated from Azerbaijan six years ago and obtained citizenship. “If he can, it may be for a crime and it is for the safety of America.”

At the same time, the public seems to fight against aggressive immigration tactics of the Trump administration and how mass deportation was carried out in practice.

Videos and reports have captured federal agents surrounding or chasing immigrant street vendors, delivery drivers and construction workers. The clashes between the officers and the activists and the observers broke out in the work palates, the workplaces and the courses before. Apprehensions have prevented Members of the beloved community, undocumented parents with children and spouses of American origin, and American citizens, many of whom were Latinos.

More than half of the voters, 53%, think that the deportation process of people was not fair; 44% said it was above all right.

A similar part – 52% – disapproves of the management by Mr. Trump of immigration; 46 percent approve. And 51% said that his actions concerning the application of immigration had gone too far.

In the Trump era, it is not uncommon for people to keep what may seem to be contradictory opinions of the president’s agenda. On questions such as crime, prices and immigration, voters largely support the objectives of the concept, but believe that in practice, the actions of Mr. Trump go too far.

A small but substantial voters – about 15% – really embodies this dissonance with regard to immigration. They exist in the complicated environment, saying that they are largely in favor of expulsion, but believe that Mr. Trump’s administration has been unfair or went too far.

These voters are much more likely to identify themselves as a democrats than the Republicans. They largely disapprove of Trump’s work yield on immigration, but also see a need for an increase in the application of immigration.

Patrick Morrissey, 74, a retirement democrat and federal auditor in Albuquerque, said that he generally believed that people who had illegally crossed the country should be expelled, but that he had mixed feelings about the elimination of those who worked hard and paid tax.

Mr. Morrissey said that he feared that the Trump administration would not give these immigrants an equitable chance of pleading their affairs in court, and he did not approve the masked federal agents who went down to the cities.

“The fact that they cover their faces-it says a lot about my mind,” he said. “It reminds me of the 1930s in Germany, the way they go after immigrants, the way they find them on the street. It doesn’t seem in the right way. ”

FITTTA Campbell, 47, assistant teaching at Atlanta who considered himself a moderate democrat or republican rather than a democrat, said that she thought that the immigration process to obtain a legal residence or citizenship was part of the American.

“If people are here three, four years and have not taken legal procedures to be legalized, I can see them expel someone like that,” she said.

Legal immigration to the United States has become an increasingly difficult route for people of a large part of the world, because Congress has not succeeded for decades to repair a dated dysfunctional system.

Citizenship and immigration services in the United States, the agency that deals with green cards, naturalization and other immigration applications, has more than 11 million pending cases, most in at least a decade.

But Ms. Campbell had been disrupted to see American citizens and other people with legal status taken in the Dragnet, she said. In some cases, she had read or heard, she added, people had not had the opportunity to show their legal documents or had been ignored when they said they were in the country legally. Other people who have been expelled, including a couple at the school of his grandson, seemed to be “honest, decent and legal parents,” she said.

“I think the Trump administration, they choose and choose who they are looking for, and it doesn’t make sense,” she said. “The people they expel are people who are positive influences for America.”

In general, the country still considers positive immigration, according to a recent Gallup investigation, which revealed an increasing part of voters who declared that immigration was a “good thing”.

Voters are however divided on the question of whether “open to immigrants” is a good description for America at the moment: 48% said that it described America well, while 49% said it was not in the Times / Siena survey.

Three -quarters of the Republicans said that America was open to immigrants; Three -quarters of the Democrats said no.

Eric Restani, 54, a hairdresser in San Jose, California, fell into this last category. He said that the administration had unfairly launched all immigrants as criminals while agents of the customs application and customs agents have raised the districts in what he compared to a “witch hunt”.

“It tears families,” he said. “The moment we are in reminds me of a lot of apartheid.”

In Michigan, Arthur Rivera, 46, a professional computer and real estate agent who had not affiliated to a political party, said that he thought that the country remained open to immigrants, judging by the high number of immigrants who occupied jobs in the technological and engineering industries. But he said that the country’s immigration system has been broken for decades.

Having grown up in a Hispanic district of the Detroit region, he said, he knew that the system was not fair for immigrants. Applications could take years to treat and be too expensive to afford or too complicated to understand. However, he also sympathized with friends and family members working as federal immigration agents on the southern border, some of which had struggled to treat the large number of migrants crossing the Biden administration.

“We need to change in all directions,” he said.

Miriam Jordan Contributed reports.