• Blog
  • California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
  • Cart
  • Checkout
  • Contact
  • DMCA
  • Home
  • My account
  • Privacy Policy
  • Shop
Tuesday, October 7, 2025
  • Login
Buyer's Insight
  • Home
  • Top Stories
  • Local News
    • Politics
    • Business & Economy
    • Entertainment
    • Sports
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Science & Environment
  • Technology
  • Review Radar
    • Weight Loss Products Reviews
    • Forex Trading
    • Shop
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Top Stories
  • Local News
    • Politics
    • Business & Economy
    • Entertainment
    • Sports
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Science & Environment
  • Technology
  • Review Radar
    • Weight Loss Products Reviews
    • Forex Trading
    • Shop
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
Buyer's Insight
No Result
View All Result

“ Not a workplace ”: pleads of junks from the Supreme Court to bring political parties under chic law

Emily Carter by Emily Carter
October 7, 2025
in Politics
Reading Time: 1 min read
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
The Supreme Court rejected a plea aimed at bringing the political parties registered under the region of the 2013 law on the sexual harassment of women in the workplace (prevention, prohibition and reparation).

The law on sexual harassment of women in the workplace (prevention, prohibition and reparation) was born in 2013 to protect women from sexual harassment in workplaces and ensure a safe work environment.

A bench of the chief judge of India BR Gavai and the judges K Vinod Chandran and ATUL S Chandurkar declared that the application of the chic law to the political parties would open a box of Pandora and would become a tool for blackmail and abusive use.

“How do you assimilate political parties as a place of work? When a person joins a political party, it is not a job. It is not a job because he joins the political parties of their own will and without recalling. How did the law against sexual harassment at the workplace included political parties?

The high -level court heard an appeal against a judgment of the high court of the Kerala in 2022 which declared that political parties were not contrary to establishing ICCs in the absence of a relationship with the employees.

The main lawyer Shobha Gupta, appearing for the petitioner Yogamaya MG, has submitted that many women are active members of the political parties, only the CPM had an internal complaint committee.

The Superior Court had previously refused to hear a pil with a similar prayer.

Source link

Post Views: 0
Tags: bringchicCourtjunkslawPartiespleadsPoliticalSupremeworkplace
Previous Post

Detroit Lions CB Terrion Arnold injury from the probable “end of the season”

Next Post

SEAN “Diddy” lawyers fembs slamed judge judge

Related Posts

Politics

Nitin Gadkari says there was a paid campaign against him when E20 deploy

October 7, 2025
Politics

Safety measures reinforced in Manipur before the probable visit of Prime Minister Modi on September 13

October 7, 2025
Politics

Rahul Gandhi expected to confirm earlier pleas were filed on his instructions: Satyaki Savarkar in court

October 7, 2025
Politics

Chicago deployment not legal: NPR

October 7, 2025
Politics

PM Modi says Mohan Bhagwat dedicated life to societal transformation as RSS chief

October 7, 2025
Politics

Gujarat Guv Acharya Devvrat also supports Maharashtra

October 7, 2025
Next Post

SEAN "Diddy" lawyers fembs slamed judge judge

Zoma News Pulse

  • Home
  • California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
  • Contact
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Top Stories
  • Local News
    • Politics
    • Business & Economy
    • Entertainment
    • Sports
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Science & Environment
  • Technology
  • Review Radar
    • Weight Loss Products Reviews
    • Forex Trading
    • Shop
  • Contact